Considering NK and SK have been having clashes since the 70's, nothing will come out of it. If I may remind you, NK and SK are technically still at war due to a peace agreement never being reached after the '53 war.
Palestine and Israel, Russia and Georgia, Bosnia, Britain and Argentina, these are all clashes which have occurred in the past 40 years and all of them where much much worse, none of them escalated into a global or nuclear war.
An NK torpedo sunk a SK warship killing 46 sailors in March, troops exchanged fire over the border in September causing several causalities. These are both much larger situations than the current shelling. As for the US carrier in the surrounding area, this was a training exercise that had been scheduled months in advance with the SK navy. As for China, since at the moment they are NK's strongest ally, supplying them with most of their food and fuel, their response has been very muted. Apart from issuing a few bland statements, nothing else has been done. After the 2006 nuclear detonation, some are even saying that the Chinese political parties are beginning to view NK as more of a liability than an asset.
If you really do want to discuss these attacks and possibly the politics behind this, try reading the news rather than basing everything off a site like 4chan and then harping on about world war three. It's rather childish.
Food for thought.There is some suggestion these recent actions, the alleged torpedoing of the South Korean warship and now the shelling of South Korean territory, are all something to do with the North's own internal politics in a period of risky transition as power passes from an ailing Kim Jong-il to his youngest son.
If the heir apparent is trying to earn his stripes in the eyes of a hardline military elite then it spells a period of further, dangerous unpredictability and it's difficult to know what any government can do about it.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote













